Very late magazine delivery, again

February 5th, 2007

janissue.jpg

For the second time, the local Digitalphotograper was late in delivery. While the November issue was sent a week before the month ended, this month’s issue beat it when I received it at 31 January! Already, other subscribers were complaining about it at the forum. I don’t know but for both, the reason given by the publishers were the same: they were on queue at the printers. Such a lame excuse considering that we subscribers are entitled to better service. I won’t be surprised that this will happen again with the same reason.

Tags:

Search

 

3 Responses to “Very late magazine delivery, again”

  1. estan Says:

    Your right Jeryc. And from the looks of it, seems that the February issue is again delayed. The image at their website is still not updated for this month.


  2. Outsidebound Says:

    Being late on the newsstands is a mortal sin! If there is one thing I learned while I was at Summit, it’s that deadlines are sacred. Publishers who do not deliver what is due to their readers should not be given any sympathy.


  3. Sidney Says:

    I didn’t purchased the issue but the cover looks good !
    I always have a lot of sympathy for printers and publishers!


Leave a Reply